Thursday, September 22, 2011

Toshiba 46SL417U Review

Toshiba 46SL417U
These days, it’s incredible how much you can get in an HDTV at an affordable price—that is, as long as you don’t care about 3D, a razor-thin profile, or a perfect picture. The Toshiba 46SL417U, a 47-inch LED-lit HDTV, offers a nice selection of features, including built-in Wi-fi, a solid stable of Web apps, and some of the best energy-consumption stats we’ve seen in a screen this size, all for just $1,099.99 (direct). This set isn’t perfect; the menu system is convoluted and the picture lacks shadow detail, but for the price, it’s a solid deal.
Design and Features
The set combines a simple, utilitarian design with a surprising splash of style. If you look at the screen head-on, you’ll see a simple Toshiba HDTV, with a plain flat bezel highlighted only by the Toshiba logo in the middle of the lower edge. If you look at it from an angle, though, you’ll see a surprising flourish seldom seen on today’s TVs: chrome. The left and right edges of the HDTV are mirror-finished, chrome plastic. A ton of reflective chrome would be distracting when watching the screen, but the hints of chrome on the sides here simply make the set look appealingly unique. The screen measures just 1.2 inches thick, very thin but certainly not record-breaking for an LED-backlit set.

46SL417U View SlideshowSee all (8) slides

Toshiba 46SL417U : Screen
Toshiba 46SL417U : Angle
Toshiba 46SL417U : Front
Toshiba 46SL417U : Profile
More
The connections on the back panel are placed almost perfectly. Unlike other HDTVs where most of the inputs face straight out from the back, every connection is instead placed along the side and bottom of a recessed area. These side- and bottom-facing inputs make switching devices a snap, especially if the set is mounted on a wall.
The 9-inch remote control is similarly stylized and loaded with useful concessions, which help overcome its otherwise bulky design. The wand is thick and has a gentle curve, with a raised glossy black panel holding all the buttons on top of a silver accent around its edges. The buttons are thoughtfully laid out, with the number pad on the top and Web app, navigation, and playback controls proceeding down the remote. Unfortunately, the buttons are fairly narrow and flat, and not incredibly easy to feel for blindly. On the bright side, a dedicated Netflix button makes accessing the world’s most popular video-streaming service a cinch.

46SL417U Specifications

Screen Size
46 inches
Type
LCD TV, HDTV, LED
Supported Refresh Rates
120Hz
Video Inputs
Component, DVI, HDMI
Networking Options
Ethernet
Height
28.58 inches
Width
42.44 inches
Depth
11.3 inches
Weight
40.57 lb
More
Not only does the 46SL417U come with a wide selection of Web apps, the set can access them wirelessly with integrated Wi-Fi, an often-desired but not-omnipresent HDTV feature. In fact, it’s the least-expensive Wi-Fi-enabled set at this screen size we’ve tested. In addition to one-button Netflix access, the TV loads Yahoo Widgets while watching television through the dedicated Yahoo Button. YouTube, Pandora, CinemaNow, Vudu, or Blockbuster-on-Demand content (along with Netflix) are delivered via the Net TV button. There aren’t any social media apps (besides the Yahoo! widgets) or Web browsers, but if you just want to watch online content, you get a wide library of services.

46SL417U Picture and Energy Performance


When we test HDTVs, we calibrate the screen for brightness and contrast and set color temperature to a “warm” setting to produce the best picture that an average user could reasonably get from the HDTV without extensive calibration work. The Toshiba HDTV comes with an almost-too-wide array of settings; color temperature can be altered on a scale of 0 to 10, and that’s before going into the more advanced color calibration settings. Individual color gain and offset settings for red, green, and blue let skilled users micromanage their HDTV’s color settings and pull out the best color profile manually. It’s unreasonable to expect the average user to do this sort of work, though, and the out-of-box color settings and black levels are less than optimal. As such we had to spitball the correct temperature setting at Standard mode with a Color Temperature setting of 2 (the lower the level, the warmer the colors).
We used a chromometer to measure luminance and color profiles after the simple calibration. The 46SL417U puts out a generous 274.93 cd/m2 peak white output. However, its black levels only reach down to an unimpressive 0.07 cd/m2. But even mediocre black levels can’t preclude a solid screen; the 46-inch Sony Bravia KDL-46EX720 ($1,599.99, 4 stars) produced similar black levels but earned Editors’ Choice status given its 3D support and other features. Even better, the 47-inch 3D-enabled LG Infinia 47LW5600 ($1,699.99, 4.5 stars) manages to combine a wide feature set with an excellent picture, and adds in a top-notch 0.01 cd/m2 peak black level. With both white and black levels, the 46SL417U offers a respectable contrast ratio of 1:3913.
Color on the HDTV is decent, but blues were just a little too purple. The advanced color settings of the HDTV can readily fix this, but it’s an extra step that you don’t need to take with many other TVs. I tested the 46SL417U with the special edition Blu-ray of Mission Impossible. While it required some slight tweaking, the picture was okay, but the mediocre black levels produced muddled shadow details in darker scenes. Viewing angles proved a small frustration also. While the HDTV remains watchable at wide angles, this set suffers from slight color distortion when you view it off-axis. This is an issue we haven’t encountered in other LED-backlit LCD HDTVs.
Energy efficiency is laudable. In its brightest mode, the 46SL417U consumed a modest 95 watts. In calibrated Movie 2 mode, the number dropped down to 74 watts. The screen-dimming AutoView mode saw power consumption plummet to a very low 42 watts, though the screen might be too dim for some to comfortably watch in that mode. Movie 2 mode is the best compromise, with the lowest power consumption we’ve seen, earning the HDTV our GreenTech seal of approval.
Considering its broad feature set, decent picture, and excellent energy efficiency, the Toshiba 46SL417U is a great bargain at $1,100. It’s not a perfect HDTV, and you’ll benefit from giving the screen at least a cursory calibration (and even then, black levels won’t be particularly good), but it still offers a lot of functionality for the price. If features and low energy costs matter more to you than a cinema-perfect picture, you’ll be pleased with the 46SL417U.

46SL417U

Related Technology Reviews

LG 42LV5500 Review

LG 42LV5500
A 42-inch LED HDTV with a 1,920 by 1,080 resolution, the LG 42LV5500 ($1,199 list) boasts a contrast ratio in the millions, a 120Hz refresh rate, the LG Magic Motion remote and more. The set offers LG’s XDA image engine and a list of web options through Smart TV with a Wi-Fi adapter.
Design and Features
The LG 42LV5500 sports a sleek, all-black glossy finish like most LED TVs. Lining the edges of its bezel is a finish of clear plastic, and its speakers are found in its back. Thanks to LED technology, this set is a mere 1.2 inches thin. The TV can connect to other devices through two USB ports, four HDMI inputs, AV and component video inputs, PC audio and RGB inputs, an RS-232 LAN port and more.

LG 42LV5500


Thanks in part to the XDA image engine, the LG 42LV5500 boasts a 5 million to 1 contrast ratio and a 120Hz refresh rate, which improve image sharpness and reduce image blur, respectively. The LED lit TV offers a slew of Internet features as well through its Ethernet or Wi-Fi connections. Features like LG Smart TV, which provides users with Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, Hulu Plus and more.
In addition to a list of apps and games, users interact with these features through the Magic Motion remote, an included remote control with motion control a’ la the Nintendo Wii remote. The LG 42LV5500 can connect to devices through DLNA sharing, and is Energy Star-compliant thanks in part to its efficient LED screen.

LG 42LV5500 Specifications

Screen Size
42 inches
Type
LCD TV, HDTV, LED
Supported Refresh Rates
120Hz
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Video Inputs
Component, Composite, HDMI
Speakers Included
Yes
Stand Supplied?
Yes
Height
24.3 inches
Width
39.8 inches
Depth
1.2 inches
Weight
29.1 lb

LG 42LV5500

Related Technology Reviews

ViewSonic VP3D1 Review

ViewSonic VP3D1
Similar in many ways to the Optoma 3D-XL ($400 street, 4 stars) that I recently reviewed, the ViewSonic VP3D1 ($300 street) video processor is designed to solve the same problem. Quite simply, it’s the missing link that lets 3D-ready projectors show Blu-ray 3D discs and 3D TV signals in 3D. More important, it does the job it’s meant for, and does it reasonably well.
As of this writing, today’s low-cost 3D-ready projectors all have HDMI 1.3 ports, which means they can’t accept 3D signals from sources that require HDMI 1.4. Those sources include Blu-ray players, cable TV, FIOS, and the like. The VP3D1 video processor converts the signal from an HDMI 1.4 source to a form the projectors can handle, so you can watch in 3D at 720p HD resolution.

 VP3D1 View SlideshowSee all (4) slides

ViewSonic VP3D1 : Front
ViewSonic VP3D1 : Angle
ViewSonic VP3D1 : Back
ViewSonic VP3D1 : Angle
More
Physically, the VP3D1 has a sleeker look to it than the Optoma 3D-XL, with a similar matte black case, but a glossy black front panel. The difference translates to more of a consumer electronics look and feel, as opposed to the 3D-XL’s more techy look. The ViewSonic version is also much larger, at 1.2 by 16.9 by 8.2 inches, but about the same weight, at 2.7 pounds.
VP3D1 Easy to Setup, Easy to Use
The back panel on the VP3D1 offers same key set of connectors as the Optoma 3D-XL, with two HDMI 1.4a input ports and one HDMI 1.3 output. In addition, there’s a USB 2.0 port for service and firmware upgrades. Setup is easy. Connect video sources to one or both HDMI inputs, connect your projector to the HDMI output, and plug in the power cord. That’s it.
Using it is also easy. To watch in 2D at resolutions up to 1080p (assuming your projector can handle it), turn on your video source, projector, and the VP3D1. You may or may not also have to press the button on the front of the unit to pick the right HDMI input.
To watch in 3D, follow the same steps, but also set the source and projector to turn on 3D. For sources that use side-by-side format, like FIOS, you also have to press the SBS button on the front of the unit. Then put on DLP-Link glasses, turn them on, and watch.
VP3D1 Complications
I tested the VP3D1 with both FIOS, which uses side-by-side 3D format, and a Sony PlayStation 3 playing Blu-ray 3D discs. For the projector, I used the Editors’ Choice Optoma GT720 ($800 street, 4 stars), which offers a native 720p resolution. Once set up, everything worked as promised. However, I ran into a small complication setting up the PlayStation.
Part of the PlayStation 3 setup involves the audio settings, with Manual and Automatic setup choices. When I chose Automatic, however, the PlayStation insisted that the HDMI device had no audio support. After several failed attempts, I chose Manual instead and set the options myself. The good news is that everything then worked.
The bad news is that the manual setup may be difficult for less knowledgeable users, since first you have to figure out the right settings, and the PlayStation warns that if you pick the wrong ones you can blow out your speakers. It’s not clear how common the problem I experienced will be, however. ViewSonic says that it has not been able to reproduce it and is still looking into it.

VP3D1 Additional Issues


According to ViewSonic, the VP3D1 should work with any 3D-ready projector with DLP-Link support and an HDMI input. As for the video source, the company says that in addition to the sources I tested with (PlayStation 3 and FIOS), it’s compatible with any source that uses any of eight 3D formats: side-by-side at 1080i50 and 1080i60 and both frame-pack and top and bottom at 1080p24, 720p50, and 720p60.
For most people, the choice between the VP3D1 and Optoma 3D-XL is pretty much a toss-up. The VP3D1 lacks the Optoma 3D-XL’s ability to use two units in tandem with two projectors to give you full 1080p 3D, but this isn’t much of an issue. Few people are likely to consider setting up two projectors this way, since it’s the sort of project that’s best left to professional installers and extremely expensive home theater installations.
The Viewsonic VP3D1 costs less than the Optoma 3D-XL, but there’s less to that difference than you might think, since the Optoma 3D-XL comes with one pair of 3D glasses and the VP3D1 includes none. Buy a pair of glasses with the VP3D1, and the price is essentially the same for either unit. Ultimately, what the VP3D1 gives you is no more and no less than a well matched alternative to the Optoma 3D-XL that works just as well, is just as easy to set up and use, and, most important, is just as easy to recommend.

VP3D1

Related Technology Reviews

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Motorola Atrix 4G AT T Review

Motorola Atrix 4G (AT&T)
The Motorola Atrix ($99 with a two-year AT&T contract) is at the front spot of a equipment revolution. This commanding cell phone that transforms into a mainframe or a desktop PC shows us what may possibly very well be the prospect of mobile computing. Soon we force all carry a modest brain in our pocket that pops into a dock and becomes a desktop, a mainframe, a dosage, or a phone, all allotment the same CPU and storage. With the Atrix, even if, some of these bleeding-edge facial appearance have bugs and rough edges, even if the July 2011 Gingerbread 2.3.4 update alleviates many of these (more on this not more than). AT&T’s belt pricing discourages the use of the Atrix in mainframe mode. But that’s okay. Even lacking rotary into a desktop or mainframe, the Atrix is a top-of-the-line smartphone for the techno-elite. It’s also one of The Best Phones on AT&T.
Agreed the Atrix’s unique scenery, we’ll initiation out by outlining the Atrix’s “ordinary” phone facial appearance, as far as the nation’s first dual-core smartphone can be painstaking ordinary. Then we’ll take in the phone’s transformation into a mainframe and a desktop, and then we’ll wrap it up with some pricing concerns and recommendations.
Editor’s Note: This assess was updated on Dignified 8, 2011 to imitate software updates in view of the fact that the phone’s launch.

Atrix 4G Specifications

Atrix 4G Benefit Provider
AT&T
In commission Logic
Machine OS
Cover Size
4 inches
Cover Details
960×540 IPS LCD capacitive upset cover
Camera
Yes
Network
GSM, UMTS
Bands
850, 900, 1800, 1900, 2100
High-Speed Data
GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA
Processor Speed
2 GHz
Atrix 4G More

Atrix 4G View SlideshowSee all (8) slides

Motorola Atrix 4G (AT&T): Front
Motorola Atrix 4G (AT&T): Back
Motorola Atrix 4G (AT&T): Laptop Dock
Motorola Atrix 4G (AT&T): Laptop Dock
More

Atrix 4G Physical Facial appearance and Call Feature
To initiation, the Motorola Atrix is a excellent-looking phone. At 2.5 by 4.6 by 0.4 inches (HWD) and 4.8 ounces, it’s clad in smooth black fake with an attractive fade try out on the back panel. The 960-by-540 cover is really gorgeous; it’s sharper than any additional you’ll find on a phone, with the exception of Apple’s 960-by-640 Retina Spectacle on the iPhone 4 ($199-$699, 4.5 stars). Colors look rich both at home and out. This isn’t a ordinary Machine resolution, but in my tests, I didn’t see any problems with third-party Machine apps. The oddest physical map you’ll find on the Atrix is a fingerprint booklover, which you can use instead of a passcode to unlock the phone. According to Motorola, the fingerprint booklover comes at the question for of huge businesses that want to use the Atrix as a Citrix-based thin client.
Call feature wasn’t fantastic in my tests, but it was excellent enough to pass. First, the Atrix tends to over-report indicate strength; in my weak-indicate test, I saw two bars but couldn’t connect calls. The earpiece doesn’t get very loud, but it’s always loud enough for the agreed circumstances, so I believe the phone has the skill to adapt to the shared class noise. I heard a affront buzz all through very loud transmissions. Voices signal warm and a bit fuzzy, both receiving and sending. The speakerphone is loud, astute, and sounds brilliant, and the Atrix paired easily with an Aliph Jawbone Era Bluetooth headset ($129, 4.5 stars) for both voice calls and music.
The Atrix comes with two (yes, two!) voice dialing systems, both of which you can launch from a Bluetooth headset. There’s the ordinary Google logic, which is right enough, and Vlingo, which lets you dictate everything from text post to Web searches. I found the end to be a bit confusing; it’s so open-finished that I wasn’t sure what to say lacking a tutorial.
The Atrix bills itself as a “4G” phone, but just like the HTC Inspire 4G ($99.99, 4 stars), which uses the same modem, it only runs at HSPA 14.4 speeds, which we don’t consider 4G. Hard the handset in Manhattan, I saw speeds mostly in the 1.5Mbps range with a peak of 3Mbps, which is excellent 3G, not 4G. Upload speeds were quite slow, nearly 200Kbps. That said, the Atrix also facility with Wi-Fi 802.11n networks (counting 5GHz) and can roam overseas on GSM and HSPA networks. The phone also has a mobile hotspot mode. As for array life, the Atrix racked up 6 hours and 44 summary of talk time, which is a very excellent screening for a commanding 3G phone.
CPU, Machine, and CD
The first dual-core smartphone to hit the U.S., the Atrix now runs Machine 2.3 on the Nvidia Tegra 2 chipset. Tegra 2 has dual ARM Cortex-A9 cores running at 1GHz each, and it’s competitive with additional top-of-the-line, dual-core smartphones. CPU and reminiscence door benchmarks stayed relatively even after we helpful the Gingerbread update. Either way, graphics benchmarks were on par with dual-core phones with decrease-resolution screens, screening that Tegra can push more pixels with less sweat. This processor is wicked, and can take whatever business Machine can toss at it.
Tegra 2 brings a few visible differences to Machine. Most notably, Sparkle runs much, much best than it has on any smartphone I’ve ever seen before. Sparkle elements on Web pages pop up more promptly and interaction is much smoother. Record playback is also a major strength here. The Atrix was the first phone that may possibly handle my 1080p HD test records, in both WMV and MPEG4 formats. (This becomes vital when you hook the phone up to an HDTV.)
There’s lots of room on the Atrix; the phone comes with in this area 10GB free, and you can add a MicroSD card up to 32GB into a slot under the back take in. The phone can act as a sparkle drive for a PC or sync with Windows Media Player, and Motorola’s Phone Portal software lets you manage your address book or text post from your PC over a USB or Wi-Fi connection.
Further than Machine, Motorola and AT&T have each added their own software here. Motorola’s role is Blur, its shared-networking suite. Even as I like Blur on some midrange phones, here I wish I may possibly just turn it off, download my own apps, and save the phone’s array. The Gingerbread update refined the look of the home screens, round out how you batter between them, and also round over menu scrolling so that it has a modest stretch to it. As typical, AT&T litters the phone with bloatware like a bar-code scanner and a Yellow Pages app, but none of it really gets in the way.
Most of the bugs we originally ran into back in February departed with the Gingerbread update, but some wait. AT&T’s U-Verse Live TV streaming app still isn’t exact. It’s slow-moving to initiation up and sometimes stutters a bit, but it really the the boards smoothly now, even in full cover mode. The update seems to have cured the Atrix’s spectacle orientation and intermittent Wi-Fi connection issues, but it was still hit-or-miss whether the Webtop would activate by the book after I docked the Atrix. Even with the various improvements, there’s still a bit of a cumulative sense of rough edges with the Atrix.
There’s a 5-megapixel camera on the back of the Atrix, and a pointless VGA camera on the front of the phone. Camera performance, much like call feature, is just fine, not brilliant. I got bluish, vaguely soft cinema with a 0.7-second shutter falter. Not iPhone-level awesome, but impeccably conventional for a camera phone. I was much more impressed with the phone’s record competency; I was able to capture smooth 720p videos at 30 frames per second, both at home and out.
The Mainframe Dock
Permanent alone, the Atrix is a top-notch Machine phone, but it isn’t a game changer. The optional mainframe and desktop docks are what change equipment: they make a strong line of reasoning that you don’t need another notebook. All you need is a phone.
The Atrix mainframe dock is a slim, gorgeous, 2.34-pound notebook constructed of metal and soft fake. The build is accurate to exact. It looks like a right notebook, but the mainframe dock has no processor, no reminiscence, and no storage, it’s just a shell. To use it, you pop open a flap on the back and plug in your Atrix. Abruptly, the dock comes to life in a upset Motorola calls the “Webtop Attention,” which looks like a full-fledged version of Linux that’s running Machine in a dialogue box. (Dock pricing is outlined on the next page.)
The mainframe is enjoyable to type on. It has a very generous trackpad, and the 11.6-inch 1366-by-768 spectacle is astute. I wish the right Shift key was a bit better, but, admittedly, that’s a minor quibble. The dock also has two USB ports on the back; you can plug in a mouse, a USB sparkle drive or a card booklover. There are no speakers, audio comes through the phone’s speakerphone.
The dock has its own array, which charges the Atrix and can run for in this area eight hours, according to Motorola. When the Atrix is docked, it first uses the dock’s array, so when you take out the phone, it’s always fully exciting. And when you charge the dock, it charges the phone’s array first. A tiny pin on the front of the dock shows array status.

Atrix 4G

Related Technology Reviews

Casio Tryx Review

Casio Tryx
The 12-megapixel Casio Tryx ($249.99 supervise over) marks a radical design departure from your averagedigital camera. It’s a pocket camera with a swiveling tripod built right into it. Having a tripod in your back pocket opens up a whole new planet of photo ops: self-portraits become a snap, long exposure shots (for stunning nighttime photos) are doable, and the many angles of the tripod grant some pretty appealing photo vantages. The LCD even moves nearly: it can spin 270 degrees, so no matter which way the camera lens is facing you can always see the viewfinder. The Tryx is certainly a fun gadget, and if you’re a creative photographer it’s a blast. But there are a lot of basic digital camera facial appearance gone here. You get no optical zoom and no optical image stabilization, and the LED sparkle has restricted usefulness (more on that in a small). Agreed its map set, the Tryx is really more like a pocket camcorder than a traditional digital camera.
Design, LCD, Lens
The look of the Tryx is its largest selling top. The camera, which comes in black or colorless, is super-slim and set alight, at 2.3 by 4.8 by 0.6 inches (HWD) and 5.5 ounces. When the tripod is folded up, the camera looks a lot more like a smartphone. Between the integrated tripod and the articulating LCD, there’s no right or incorrect way to hold this camera. There are only two buttons to be found: Power, and the shutter release, both next to the upset-cover LCD.

Tryx View SlideshowSee all (10) slides

Casio Tryx :
Casio Tryx : Front
Casio Tryx : Vertical
Casio Tryx : Angle
More
The LCD is very astute, packing 460k dots into a 3-inch spectacle. The Editors’ Extent Sony Bloggie Upset pocket camcorder ($199.99, 4 stars) has a 3-inch spectacle to the top with a more typical 230K dots—the Tryx is twice as astute. It’s a high-feature spectacle for a $250 camera: The Canon PowerShot Elph 300 HS ($249.99, 4 stars) includes a 2.7-inch spectacle, to the top with 230K dots. Images look very clear on the Tryx’s LCD viewfinder, and it’s simple to see from far away.
The upset-cover user boundary is austere to use, but don’t guess the level of intuitiveness or speed you get from, say, a smartphone. It’s a minimalistic encounter, one lacking multi-upset or pinch-and-zoom capabilities. Instead, you get huge, fiddle with-forthcoming boxes as buttons that are simple to tap.

Tryx Specifications

Type
Compact
Megapixels
12.1 MP
Media Plot
Reliable Digital Extended Room
35-mm Corresponding (Wide)
21 mm
LCD size
3 inches
Record Resolution
Yes
More
The lens on the Tryx is exceptionally wide, so you’ll be able to cram a lot into your photos. The most-ordinary wide-angle lenses we’ve seen are nearly 28mm, even if each once in a even as a camera like the Fujifilm Finepix F550EXR ($349.95, 3 stars) comes with a lens that starts at 24mm. The Tryx is even wider at 21mm. The extreme wide angle makes it very simple to take self portraits, because you don’t have to house (or hold) the camera very far away to get everything in the frame. Keep in mind, even if, there’s no optical zoom on the lens—the 21mm view is all you get. There’s also no optical image stabilization, so as with a cell phone or pocket HD camcorder, still images will likely be blurry if there’s any shift at all. The tripod helps, but it’s not a cure-all for stabilization issues. The usefulness of the sparkle is restricted too; you turn it on via a menu choice, and it stays on until you turn it off, there’s no auto mode like the sparkle on a typical camera. Casio assures me, even if, that a prospect firmware update will enable auto sparkle for still images. Still, for shooting self-portraits, the wide-angle lens, tripod, and LCD combine to place forward as excellent an encounter you’ll find in a pocket camera.
One hazard of such a wide lens is barrel distortion, and the Tryx certainly shows symptoms. A accurate eye will notice that the lens tends to exaggerate and stretch the center of the image towards the outer province, building your subjects look a modest full. The look isn’t extreme with the Tryx, but it’s certainly there.
Performance
The Tryx takes in this area 3.5 seconds to power up and spring out, which is not particularly quick for a top-and-spring out camera. Once on, it picks up the pace, snapping shots with just a 1.4-second wait between them. Shutter lag (the time between pin push and image capture) is respectable at 0.5 second. The same-price Canon PowerShot 300 HS, in comparison, powers up and shoots in 2.0 seconds, averages 1.4 seconds of wait time between shots, and has the same 0.5-second shutter lag time.
In the PCMag Labs we use Imatest to neutrally rate image feature. Test images from the Tryx leisurely up nicely, offering a center-weighted average of 1,915 lines per depiction height. The Canon PowerShot 300 HS averaged a also levelheaded 1,861 lines. Images from this camera are astute.
Imatest also events image noise, and if noise levels rise privileged than 1.5 percent, shots will be plainly gritty. I was able to dial the Tryx all the way up to ISO 3200 before success that threshold. This means that even with not having a generous sensor or an exceptionally bright lens, under the right circumstances, the Tryx can be a excellent low-set alight shooter. The best way to get low-set alight shots of non-moving objects is to set the camera to ISO 100 (the mode which produces the least amount of noise), but this requires long exposures which in turn demand the camera to be impeccably still—hence the built-in tripod.
In-Camera Extras, Record, and Conclusions
Casio includes two noteworthy in-camera software equipment to boost your photo creativity. There’s a Landscape mode, which lets you swipe the Tryx left to right to initiation a 360-top view—it’s smart enough to know when the camera is back to where it started. The Tryx can also initiation right High Dynamic Range (HDR) photos by compelling several under- and over-exposed images of the same subject, and merging them together on the glide. You have the extent of over- or under-exposing by one, two, or three stops, but know that the privileged you go, the more your photos will look like art pieces.
Record is recorded at 30 frames per second, in either 720p or 1080p and are saved as .MOV records, which can be uploaded natively to Facebook and YouTube. You also have the choice to take slow-shift record: the camera captures 240 frames per second, and the the boards it back at 30 frames per second—it’s a clean attention-grabber. Slow-shift record, even if, can only be captured at 432 by 320 (which is even less vital than 640-by-480 ordinary definition).
Footage captured with the Tryx looks excellent, but it can be a tad uncomfortable at era in view of the fact that there’s no optical stabilization. As with still images, when set alight is excellent, the record is astute, but as your set alight subsides, your record feature suffers. Captured audio is clear. Even on busy streets, voices of subjects in front of the camera had no distress cutting through the shared class noise.
The camera saves photos and videos to SDXC, SDHC and SD reminiscence cards. There’s a micro-HDMI port on board, so you can plug the camera right into your HDTV for playing back images and videos in high-definition. There’s also a proprietary USB port (a cable is built-in) for connecting to your notebook. A ordinary micro- or mini-USB port would have been best, but that’s sorry to say rare with most digital cameras.
The $250 Casio Tryx isn’t a fantastic traditional camera, in view of the fact that it’s gone some key digital camera facial appearance. What it is, even if, is a lot of fun to use. Its innovative design with transforming tripod, super wide lens, and clean in-camera equipment can boost your photo and record creativity. If you want a way to spring out self-portraits and get all the ordinary compact camera trappings, try the Editors’ Extent Samsung DualView TL225 ($349.99, 4 stars)—it has an LCD on the back and on the front, so you can physically even as you’re snapping photos.

Tryx

Related Technology Reviews

Favi E1-LED-Pico Review

FAVI E1-LED-PICO
The Favi E1-LED-Pico ($200 street) projector is the consumer counterpart to the Favi B1-LED-Picobusiness-oriented pico projector ($280 street, 3.5 stars). Geared mainly for projecting record and photos, the E1 can be used most somewhere, as it can run off AA batteries when it’s not plugged into its built-in power adapter. It’s equally at home in a family room, a hotel room, or on a camping trip (provided you have a fleeting or portable cover). Even if not the brightest or most full-featured model in town, it does a excellent job for a projector at this price.
E1-LED-Pico Design and Facial appearance
The not glossy-black E1 events 1 by 4.5 by 2.4 inches (HWD) and weighs 4 ounces, lacking batteries. The 12-lumen, RGB LED-based lamp—by LCoS (liquid crystal on silicon) spectacle equipment—is rated to last up to 20,000 hours, so it should last the life of the projector. The E1 has a native VGA (640 by 480) resolution.

E1-LED-Pico View SlideshowSee all (7) slides

Favi E1-LED-PICO : Front
Favi E1-LED-PICO : Lens
Favi E1-LED-PICO : Angle
Favi E1-LED-PICO : Batteries
More
The focus veer is positioned in the front of the projector, just privileged than the lens, and is best twisted by an index fiddle with. Focusing isn’t as smooth as with the handle control in the Favi B1. It’s also simple to get one’s fiddle with in the way of the projected image even as trying to focus. The E1 includes a tiny tripod with bendable legs. If the projector should bring down (between the frivolous tripod and the projector usually being tugged at by at least one cable, that’s bound to happen quicker or later), the focus veer can pop out, as I learned even as doing record hard. Be strict not to lose the veer, as the projector can’t be all ears lacking it.
The E1 has 1GB of domestic reminiscence, and a slot for an SD card, obscure behind the door that also houses the 4 AA batteries that power the E1 when it’s not together to a wall adapter. Favi claims that the array life should be 4-6 hours. I tested array life with Duracells; they lasted in this area 4 hours, although the image started to fade after in this area 3 hours. Although a rechargeable domestic array would have been preferable, a set of batteries will get you through a long show, and you may possibly always use rechargeable NiMh or NiCad AA cells.

 E1-LED-Pico Specifications

Engine Type
LCoS
Type
Consumer
More
In addition to the power adapter and tripod, accessories that come with the projector contain a mini USB cable for transferring records, a composite record cable, a carrying pouch, a remote control, and a set of global power-plug adapters.
The E1′s tiny remote lets you door the menu logic as well as control basic record functions (play, intermission, quick-forwards, rewind, boost or decrease volume). It lets you top out between domestic reminiscence and SD card as the file fund. One level down, you can top out between Photo, Record, and Setting. Clicking on Photo will show you the photos and let you door them. Clicking on Record will show the filename name, time, date, and size of record records you have stored.
From Setting, selecting Photo Setup lets you top out between browse mode, slideshow, and thumbnail; brilliant whether you want the images full-cover or cropped; top out a duration of the slideshow (between 5 seconds and 15 summary), and top out between various slideshow equipment. It only the the boards .mp4 and .avi show records, as well as records of additional formats after being converted into .mm2 records by the ArcSoft Media Converter software that comes with the projector.
From Record Setup, you can top out between full-cover and original size in Spectacle Mode, and whether to play a record once, do again it, or play videos in random peacefulness.
The E1′s composite record connector lets you use the projector to show record from, say, a DVD player. I viewed record in a dark room: It may possibly project record up to in this area a measuring device wide lacking it significantly bringing up the rear top. The record feature was reasonable, adequate for screening a full-length DVD in darkness. The built-in speakers, even if, weren’t really up to the task—either for volume and signal feature. You’d want to use either headset or a powered set of external speakers. On the plus side, the projector has no fan, so you won’t be enemy with fan noise like you would with the Favi B1-LED-Pico.
The Favi E1-LED-Pico doesn’t have the range of connection options or the brightness of the B1-LED-Pico or the Editors’ Extent Optoma PK301 Pico Pocket Projector ($400 street, 4 stars). Even if, it expenditure less than the B1 and just half as much as the PK301, and can run off batteries, which the B1 can’t. It’s well value consideration as a clad, low-priced entertainment projector that needn’t be tied to a wall wart.

E1-LED-Pico

Related Technology Reviews

Huawei M835 (MetroPCS) Review

Huawei M835 (MetroPCS)
Fiscal statement Machine smartphones are rotary out to be quite well loved these days. The Huawei M835 is one example of this trend, but it’s not a excellent example. In fact, it’s terrible enough to turn many public away from the smartphone thought altogether. Trust us: you can do much best on MetroPCS for near the same cash up front.
Design, Call Feature, and Apps
The Huawei M835 events 4.1 by 2.2 by 0.5 inches (HWD) and weighs 3.9 ounces. It’s a tiny phone that looks and feels excellent, with its full glass front panel and soft upset array take in. The flat, circular steering rocker is a modest detailed, but I got used to it promptly. The 2.8-inch capacitive upset cover facial appearance just 240-by-320-pixel resolution. That’s fine on a map phone or an grown-up BlackBerry, but Machine really needs at least 320-by-480 for its boundary elements and scrolling menus to make sense. It also makes fonts look fuzzy, and many Machine Promote apps don’t show up in searches, because they’re not compatible. There’s just no getting nearly this cover come forth, and it’s disappointing to keep seeing it pop up on strain new phones. The tiny 2.8-inch panel size is also a problem, but it’s not as serious. Even as the upset keyboard feels cramped, it’s not entirely unusable.

M835 View SlideshowSee all (5) slides

Huawei M835 (MetroPCS): Angle
Huawei M835 (MetroPCS): Angle
Huawei M835 (MetroPCS): Left
Huawei M835 (MetroPCS): Front
More
The M835 is a tri-band 2G 1xRTT (850/1700/1900 MHz) CDMA device with 802.11b/g Wi-Fi; the M835 together to my WPA2-encrypted Wi-Fi network lacking come forth. That’s helpful, as the 2G data radio means you’ll be coming up nearly a lot for Web pages to load. MetroPCS doesn’t have a 3G network; if you want quick relations with this carrier, you have to trade up to the 4G LTE Samsung Galaxy Indulge ($299, 4 stars). Voice feature was diverse; callers sounded a modest bright and harsh through the earpiece, but there was bounty of gain unfilled. Transmissions were choppy through the microphone, with bounty of hiss nearly my syllables, and a low-volume, shared class hiss audible throughout each call. Greeting was not more than average; I live in a marginal MetroPCS coverage area, but handsets with best greeting usually stay together; this one dropped a few calls all through hard.
Calls sounded clear through an Aliph Jawbone Era Bluetooth headset ($129, 4 stars). Voice dialing worked over Bluetooth, but it repeatedly missed digits no matter how slowly and clearly I spoke them; this is scarce for Machine’s native voice dialer. The speakerphone went surprisingly loud, although I heard bounty of distortion at the top two volume settings. Array life was fleeting at just 3 hours and 53 summary of talk time. With the phone twisted off, it displays a percentage gauge as it charges, which is helpful.

M835 Specifications

Benefit Provider
MetroPCS
In commission Logic
Machine OS
Cover Size
2.8 inches
Cover Details
240-by-320-pixel, 262K-color TFT LCD capacitive upset cover
Camera
Yes
Network
CDMA
Bands
850, 1900, 1700
High-Speed Data
1xRTT
Processor Speed
528 MHz
More
Machine 2.2 (Froyo) is on board; it’s not the latest version of Machine, but it’s the most ordinary one in the promote now. In any case, this is one slow-moving phone, and even of poorer quality than typical for a low-end device. The M835 uses a 528Mhz Qualcomm processor which is even slower than the 600Mhz units we’ve seen in many low-end Machine phones just, and the software seems to be poorly optimized.
Bringing up the dialer evenly took several seconds. Menu scrolling was choppy enough that it would freeze for a moment middle through. The have a give of WebKit browser even had distress with WAP pages; choppy scrolling and blurry fonts made browsing pointlessly hard. The free Google Maps Steering (rebranded MetroNavigator) offers voice-enabled, turn-by-turn GPS directions, and you can get your Web and Chat e-mail, but the M835 offers a substandard Machine encounter no matter how you deal with it.
M835 CD, Camera, and Conclusions
CD performance doesn’t fare much best. The microSD card slot is obscure behind the array, which makes it hard to swap. Huawei throws in a 2GB microSD card to get you started; my own 32GB SanDisk card worked fine, and there is also 137MB of free domestic storage. Use doubleTwist(Free, 4 stars) to sync your media and you’ll be fine. The ordinary-size 3.5mm earphone jack is a plus. Music tracks sounded full, if vaguely muffled, through Samsung Modus HM6450 Bluetooth headset ($99, 4 stars).
The have a give of music player was slow-moving, but it showed baby book art and worked okay if not. Huawei advertises “DTS Envelo virtual surround signal,” a mode which adds a nice sense of interval nearly the vocals and additional instruments, but at the deprivation of a harsher high midrange, less bass punch, and hazy, indistinct treble. Standalone 3GP and MP4 videos were hard to see on the dim, low draw a distinction cover, and even 320-by-240-pixel records at the cover’s native resolution stuttered all through playback.
The 3.2-megapixel camera has no sparkle or auto-focus. Test photos looked uniformly terrible; it’s been a long time in view of the fact that I’ve seen a phone absolutely botch each shot in bright, outdoor sunlight. Indoor photos were also excessively soft and gritty, even in light place to stay. Recorded videos maxed out at a pixelated, disappointing 352-by-288 resolution and only seven jerky frames per second.
The LG Optimus M ($99, 4 stars) is the cure to the Huawei M835 blues, with its better, sharper upset cover and fine performance. Don’t even reflect in this area choosing between these two; just buy the Optimus M and be done with it. MetroPCS’s best smartphone remains the Samsung Galaxy Indulge, which is much more high-priced, but includes quick 4G door, a 1GHz CPU, a privileged-resolution, 3.5-inch upset cover, and a QWERTY keyboard. If you’re a frequent texter on a fiscal statement, I’d recommend a MetroPCS map phone like the Samsung Freeform III ($49, 3.5 stars), whose physical QWERTY keyboard is superior to the upset keyboards on low-cost Machine phones.

M835

Related Technology Reviews